翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Allison Cook ・ Allison Cook (Miss Oregon) ・ Allison Copening ・ Allison Cratchley ・ Allison Crowe ・ Allison Curbishley ・ Allison Curtin ・ Allison Dale Burroughs ・ Allison Danger ・ Allison Danzig ・ Allison Davis ・ Allison DeLong ・ Allison DuBois ・ Allison Durbin ・ Allison Dysart ・ Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders ・ Allison Engine Company ・ Allison Engine Testing Stands ・ Allison Falk ・ Allison family ・ Allison Feaster ・ Allison Ferns ・ Allison Finney ・ Allison Fischer ・ Allison Fisher ・ Allison Flaxey ・ Allison Fonte ・ Allison Formation ・ Allison Forsyth ・ Allison Gap, Virginia Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders ： ウィキペディア英語版 Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders ''Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders'', , was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States holding that plaintiffs under the False Claims Act must prove that the false claim was made with the specific intent of inducing the government to pay or approve payment of a false or fraudulent claim, rather than merely defrauding a contractor. Congress overruled this decision with the Fraud Enforcement and Recovery Act of 2009. == Background == In 1985, Bath Iron Works and Ingalls Shipbuilding began construction on a new fleet of destroyers for the United States Navy. Allison Engine was subcontracted to build generator sets for these ships, and General Tool Company was hired by Allison to assemble the system. The terms of the contracts required that the work meet strict Navy specifications. Two former employees of General Tool, Roger L. Sanders and Roger L. Thacker, filed suit in the Southern District of Ohio under the False Claims Act, alleging that Allison, General Tool, and other subcontractors had knowingly submitted invoices to the shipyards for work which did not meet the Navy requirements, and that the contractors had issued false certificates of compliance with those specifications. Sanders and Thacker, as qui tam relators, would be entitled to a portion of the government's recovery from the contractors if they prevailed in the suit. The False Claims Act provided: At trial, the plaintiffs introduced as evidence the alleged false invoices, but did not provide evidence of false invoices from the shipyards to the Navy. The contractor defendants moved for judgment on the grounds that the plaintiffs had not introduced any evidence of any false claims made to the Federal government. The trial court, interpreting the language of the False Claims Act, agreed and entered judgment in favor of the defendants. On appeal, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the trial court, deciding that it was sufficient for the plaintiffs to prove that a false claim would be paid with government money, even if it was not paid directly by the government. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Allison Engine Co. v. United States ex rel. Sanders」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.